Archive for June, 2007

Turns of phrase

I do love Father Joe’s turns of phrase.  We do need to uphold our bishops in prayer;  at this point, though, my priority is to uphold the leaders of the Anglican Network in Canada in prayer.  The nastiness is going to hit the fan very shortly in our beloved Anglican church, I’m afraid, and I don’t know of a better nastiness shield than prayer….


My mum died on Saturday, three days after deep sedation was started.  It’s going to be a long week.

 Later:  Funeral, will reading, all that “fun” stuff is over.  Hopefully soon I will be able to get blogging again and tempt back the few readers I used to have….

General Synod

Father Joe Walker is blogging from General Synod, and he makes a very good point in this post.  I would only add that I think the “circle” has been misshapen for a long time now.

Doctor assisted suicide

Did you know that doctor assisted suicide is in fact legal in Canada?  Oh, they don’t call it that, and any palliative care doctor would say that doctor assisted suicide is illegal.  Well, it is illegal for a doctor to give a terminally ill patient an overdose in order to hasten death.  However, something called deep sedation is perfectly legal to provide to the terminally ill, both in the cases of untreatable severe physical pain and for existential distress.  What most of the definitions don’t bother to mention is when the patient is under deep sedation, she can neither eat nor drink, and essentially dies of thirst.  I have no real problem with this for people for whom death is iminent and who are in untreatable physical pain:  However, I have a huge problem when it is administered for “existential distress”.  By definition, anybody who is dieing is probably in “existential distress”.  We should be helping people to deal with it, not providing a method for suicide.  I have a relative who is in palliative care who has asked for deep sedation, for “existential distress”, and I seem to be the only person involved who thinks that this is immoral.  Even her priest agrees with her.  I even had a call from the social worker, who under the pretense of trying to find out how I feel about this, argued with me about calling it suicide, and tried to preassure me into supporting the decision. 

    I’m shocked that this is legal;  I’m shocked that there are people in the world who think it is moral to sedate someone into unconsciousness and then let them die of thirst;  the whole thing is just saddening beyond belief. 

Oh well.

Eastern conference champions is nothing to sneeze at, and there’s always next year.  I’m not throwing away my red tee shirt.  Go Sens Go!


Sens in 7???

I am very thankful

I am very thankful that I am a member of a parish that is led by a godly priest who has the courage to stand up for what is right.  In contrast, go to this link and scroll down to page nine, where you will find an interview with an Episcopal priest (fortunately, she doesn’t seem to have a parish to lead astray), who sees nothing wrong with being a practicing Muslim and continuing to function as a Christian priest.  Well, she may be many things, but she’s not a Christian.  I am beginning to think that following the Anglican crisis news isn’t very good for my spiritual health.  It’s the psychological equivelant of scratching a bug bite – I know it’s bad for me, but I can’t seem to stop.

 HT to Steve London at Our Hearts are Restless (see sidebar)

Tag Cloud