Archive for October, 2007
Had you been a fly on the wall in my house this evening you would’ve heard this:
Mr. F: Some of those jokes were old when I was a kid, Martin.
Alan: Wow. And you’re old !
Gee, thanks, Alan, thinks I to myself….
I’ve been trying to keep the entry on Anglican Essentials Canada on Wikipedia accurate, but I think it’s a lost cause. There was a quote from the Essentials website that was edited to put Essentials in a bad light: I put up the whole quote, and was told that it was a copyright violation, and the citation was “link spam”; but it’s not spam to imply that the only thing Essentials is concerned with is same sex blessings. Well, it’s only a copyright violation if you remove the citation… I think I should just give up, but it’s kind of like scratching an itch, it’s hard to stop. Maybe they should change there name to “politically-correct-ipedia”.
Update: My conscience has been bothering me about this post – I think the first version was unnecessarily rude, so I edited it a bit.
..But despite what he called a “strong majority” (65 per cent in favour) and “a clear directive,” the diocesan bishop, John Chapman, cautioned that the approved motion was only “a recommendation and is not binding on the diocese or bishop.”
Anyone who thinks he won’t eventually approve the motion, raise your hand…
…After the vote, Bishop Chapman told a news conference he could not say when he would announce his decision on the motion, adding that he would take the matter to the House of Bishops, which meets later this month. He added that there would be more consultations with the diocese, and other Anglicans both at the national and international level. “I really don’t know when I’ll make a decision. I just want to see the ground settle,” he said, adding that his immediate concern was “for those who voted in opposition to the motion; I want to make sure that they’re okay.”
Oh Really? Then why the veiled threats against the orthodox priests in your charge?
…Bishop Chapman said approval of the motion does not mean that clergy can now bless same-sex couples. “I would expect the clergy to honour the decision-making processes in the diocese and that continues until a decision is made,” he said. “I expect them to toe the line.”
Well, it will be interesting to see your reaction in the event that they don’t.
…He also said that the motion does not set a deadline for his decision. “It could be one day to 10 years,” he said.
So much for clarity.
…Before announcing the result of the simple majority vote, Bishop Chapman told synod members that, “there are no winners or losers in this,” adding that, it’s nothing “to mourn or celebrate; it’s just where we are.”
I think that moving our church from the faith delivered to the saints to a pale copy of Unitarian Universalism is something to mourn, myself.
…Mr. Chaplin[the man who moved the motion] also expressed the hope that “we in North America and England, will really engage our partners in the Anglican Communion in a conversation about how we engage with our culture in bringing the message of the Gospel to our place.”
Don’t you mean, how we change the gospel to reflect our culture?
George Sinclair, rector of St. Alban’s, Ottawa, who is a member of the Anglican Network, a grouping of Canadian-Anglicans who believe homosexuality is contrary to Scripture, said that he was disappointed but not surprised by the vote. “It was a wrong decision which will continue to tear the fabric of the Anglican Communion,” he said. “It’s a departure from Anglican teaching.”
You tell ’em, Father George!
…In a prepared statement, Bishop Chapman said, “This decision will be welcomed by some but not by others. However, it is the Anglican way to allow diverse opinions to live in the same house. We expect that everyone, whatever their views, will respect this decision and that we can work together in unity.”
It is the Anglican way to allow diverse Christian opinions to live in the same house. See my comment above on universalism.
…He added: “Christians who are opposed to the blessings see this as a fundamental issue of Scripture, while those Christians in favour see it as a fundamental issue of bringing gays and lesbians fully into the full life of the church.” If people decide to leave the Anglican church, “for one reason or another, then they would walk apart … That is their decision and we will grieve their decision,” he added.
Who is walking apart from whom? Take a look at the wider Anglican communion for a hint….
During the debate at the plenary, Rev. Frank Kirby, rector of St. Barnabas church, urged the synod to vote against the motion calling it “a provocation and a serious flouting” of the requests of other members of the Anglican Communion for a moratorium on same-sex blessings and the consecration of gay bishops. “We’re pushing the envelope far beyond what our sister churches can tolerate.”
Good for you, Father Frank!
Among the priorities identified[in the strategic plan] are: leadership development, congregational development, communications, infrastructure, “seeking the seekers,” and “serving God’s world.”
Congregational development? I guess the good bishop hasn’t yet noticed that the healthiest congregations in Ottawa are the orthodox ones.
Pray for us folks, we surely need it.
I have a little boy who is soon to be five years old. Once or twice a week we have the following conversation:
He: “Mummy, what day of the week is it?”
Me: “It’s [whatever]day, dear”
He: “Awww, I wanted it to be Sunday”
I wanted it to be Sunday too. As things heat up in our small corner of the Anglican world, and as I realize that the difficult and important decisions to make will have to be made sooner rather than later, I find I crave fellowship with my brothers and sisters in Christ. To be brutally honest, I also crave time in our beautiful old neo gothic church building – because, although I know that the body of Christ is the people and not the building – God used to be with his people in the temple, but Jesus changed all of that – now we are the body of Christ; still, I feel the need to spend time in the beautiful old place that my parents were married in, that I was married in, that my widowed mother was remarried in, that my infant daughter was buried from, that my sons were baptized in…
We might have to leave. It will be difficult, wrenching for some of us, and I know that as long as my church family stays mostly together and remembers why we are a family, everything will ultimately be fine. Still, I will miss that old stone building, and I will need time to mourn, both for it, and for what our poor old Canadian Anglican church seems determined to become.